Bills/S. 1105

No UPCODE Act

No UPCODE Act

In CommitteeHealthcareSenateSenate Bill · 119th Congress
Bill Progress · Senate
Introduced
Committee
Passed House
Passed Senate
Passed Both
Signed

Plain Language Summary

# No UPCODE Act Summary **What the Bill Does** The No UPCODE Act would change how the federal government pays Medicare Advantage insurance plans—private insurance alternatives to traditional Medicare that serve seniors. Currently, these plans receive payments based partly on how sick their patients are (determined by medical diagnoses).

This bill would restrict that system by: requiring the government to use two years of diagnostic data instead of potentially more; preventing the use of diagnoses found during special health reviews or assessments; and accounting for differences in how Medicare Advantage plans versus traditional Medicare code medical conditions. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects Medicare Advantage enrollees (about 28 million seniors), the private insurance companies offering these plans, and the Medicare program's budget. The bill aims to prevent what supporters view as excessive payments to Medicare Advantage plans by tightening rules around how diagnoses are counted when determining payment amounts. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Senator Bill Cassidy (R-LA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate.

CRS Official Summary

No Unreasonable Payments, Coding, Or Diagnoses for the Elderly Act or the No UPCODE Act This bill modifies certain factors that are used to determine Medicare Advantage (MA) payments, particularly relating to health status and related data. Specifically, the bill requires the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to use two years of diagnostic data in its risk adjustment methodology for MA payments. It also prohibits the CMS from using diagnoses that are collected from chart reviews or health risk assessments when adjusting payments based on health status. The CMS must also take into account any differences in coding patterns between MA and traditional Medicare when determining MA payment adjustments.

Advertisement

Latest Action

March 25, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

Sponsor

R
Cassidy, Bill [R-LA]
R-LA · Senate
1 cosponsor

Key Dates

Introduced
March 25, 2025
Last Updated
March 25, 2025
Read Full Text on Congress.gov →
Advertisement