In Committee
11186 bills
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
# Summary of SJRES 123 **What It Would Do** This bill would require the U.S. military to stop any military operations against Iran that Congress hasn't formally approved. Essentially, it asserts that the President cannot engage in hostilities with Iran without getting Congressional authorization first. If passed, any unauthorized military activities would need to end within a set timeframe. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects the President's military authority and U.S. armed forces personnel. It could also impact U.S. foreign policy toward Iran and the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government. **Current Status** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it's in the early stages of consideration and hasn't been voted on by the full Congress yet. It was introduced by Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL). The bill reflects ongoing debate about whether presidents need explicit Congressional approval before initiating military actions, a constitutional question that has been contested throughout U.S. history.
A bill to ban anticompetitive terms in facility and insurance contracts that limit access to higher quality, lower cost care.
# Summary of S 4027 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would prohibit healthcare facilities and insurance companies from including contract terms that restrict patients' ability to access better quality or lower-cost medical care. In practical terms, it would ban "anticompetitive" clauses—contractual restrictions that prevent patients from choosing alternative providers or facilities even if those alternatives offer better results at lower prices. The goal is to increase competition in healthcare and give patients more freedom to seek out affordable, high-quality care options. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill would directly impact healthcare facilities (hospitals, clinics, etc.), insurance companies, and patients. It targets restrictive contract language that may currently lock patients into particular networks or providers regardless of cost or quality considerations. By removing these barriers, the legislation aims to encourage healthcare providers to compete on price and quality rather than relying on exclusive contracts to maintain market share. **Current Status** S 4027 was introduced by Senator Jon Husted (R-OH) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. No further action has been taken at this time.
A bill to amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to designate medical facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs as innovative therapies centers of excellence, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S. 4031 **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would require the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to designate certain VA medical facilities as "innovative therapies centers of excellence." These centers would presumably focus on developing and testing advanced or new medical treatments for veterans. The bill amends federal veterans law to establish this requirement, though the specific details about which facilities would be designated or what "innovative therapies" means aren't provided in this summary. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects veterans who receive healthcare through the VA system, as well as VA medical facilities and staff. It could also influence the broader landscape of medical innovation by directing VA resources toward experimental or cutting-edge treatments. **Current Status** As of now, S. 4031 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill was sponsored by Senator Ruben Gallego (D-AZ). Without additional details about the bill's full text, it's unclear what specific therapies would be prioritized or how much funding would be involved.
A bill to support the preparation and retention of outstanding educators in all fields to ensure a bright future for children and youth in under-resourced and underserved communities in the United States, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S 4025 **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill aims to improve teacher recruitment and retention in under-resourced and underserved communities across the United States. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the information provided, the bill's focus is on supporting educator preparation programs and keeping quality teachers in schools serving disadvantaged areas—communities that typically struggle to attract and keep experienced educators. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily benefit students in under-resourced schools and underserved communities, as well as educators working in or considering careers in these areas. It could also impact teacher training programs and schools of education nationwide. **Current Status:** S 4025 was introduced by Senator Tina Smith (D-Minnesota) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. Without more detailed legislative text available, the specific mechanisms—such as whether it provides funding, loan forgiveness, incentives, or other supports—cannot be determined from this summary.
A bill to provide out-of-school time educators with professional development in STEM subjects, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S 4030 **What the Bill Does** S 4030 would provide funding and support for professional development programs in STEM subjects (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) for out-of-school time educators. Out-of-school time educators are those who teach in after-school programs, summer camps, community centers, and similar settings outside traditional classrooms. The bill aims to help these educators improve their knowledge and teaching skills in STEM areas so they can better educate students in informal learning environments. **Who It Affects and Key Details** This bill would primarily benefit out-of-school time educators and the students they serve, as well as organizations that run youth programs. By improving educator training in STEM subjects, the legislation could help more young people—particularly those who might not receive strong STEM instruction during regular school hours—develop skills in these important fields. The bill's exact provisions and funding amounts are not detailed in the available information, though it references "other purposes" suggesting additional related provisions. **Current Status** As of now, S 4030 remains in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill was sponsored by Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH).
A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to create American dream accounts.
# Summary of S. 4026: American Dream Accounts Bill **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would amend the tax code to create a new type of savings account called "American dream accounts." While the bill's full details aren't specified in the information provided, such accounts are typically designed to allow individuals to save money for major life goals—such as education, homeownership, or starting a business—with potential tax advantages. The specific benefits, contribution limits, and rules governing these accounts would be defined in the bill's full text. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The bill would primarily affect American taxpayers and savers who want to set aside funds for significant expenses or life milestones. It's currently in committee in the Senate, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full chamber. The bill was sponsored by Senator Rick Scott (R-FL). To understand the full impact and specific provisions of this proposal, you would need to review the complete bill text, as the summary provided here focuses on the general concept rather than detailed provisions about tax treatment, eligibility requirements, or account limitations.
A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a gasoline tax holiday.
# Gasoline Tax Holiday Bill Summary **What the Bill Would Do** This bill would temporarily suspend the federal excise tax on gasoline, which is currently 18.4 cents per gallon. If passed, it would create a "tax holiday" that would lower gas prices at the pump for consumers by reducing the federal tax portion of the total price. The bill aims to provide short-term relief from higher fuel costs. **Who It Affects and Key Details** This legislation would directly benefit anyone who buys gasoline, potentially lowering their fuel expenses during the holiday period. It could also affect state budgets, since the federal gasoline tax typically funds road and infrastructure maintenance programs. The bill would need to address how those programs would be funded during the tax holiday period, though specific provisions aren't detailed in the basic summary available. **Current Status** The bill (S 4032) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) but remains in committee as of now. This means it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. Many similar tax holiday proposals have been introduced over the years but face challenges related to infrastructure funding concerns and debates about their effectiveness at lowering prices.
A bill to expand equitable access to developmentally-appropriate literacy materials, programs, and family engagement in reading, especially in underserved communities, and strengthen the connection between literacy and long-term academic and economic success.
# Summary of S 4028: Literacy Access and Development Bill **What the Bill Would Do** S 4028 aims to improve access to age-appropriate reading materials and literacy programs, particularly in communities that currently lack adequate resources. The bill focuses on strengthening reading skills in children and promoting family involvement in reading activities. The underlying goal is to establish a stronger link between early literacy development and students' future academic performance and economic opportunities. **Who It Affects** The bill specifically targets underserved communities—areas with limited access to libraries, quality educational resources, and reading programs. This would primarily benefit low-income families and children in under-resourced schools and neighborhoods. More broadly, the bill could impact educational outcomes across the country if it leads to improved literacy rates. **Current Status** S 4028 is currently in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill was sponsored by Senator Andy Kim (D-NJ). At this stage, the bill remains under review and would need to advance through committee proceedings and gain broader support before it could be considered for a Senate vote.
A bill to reinforce the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 by establishing a limitations period of 10 years for antibribery offenses, and for other purposes.
# Summary of S 4029 **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill would strengthen the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), a 1977 law that makes it illegal for American companies and individuals to bribe foreign officials. The main change would establish a 10-year time limit for prosecutors to bring charges against someone for antibribery violations. Currently, there is no specified limitations period, which can create uncertainty about how long someone could potentially face prosecution for these offenses. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect U.S. businesses operating internationally, their executives, and law enforcement agencies responsible for investigating and prosecuting bribery cases. It could also impact American citizens working abroad and foreign officials involved in dealings with U.S. companies. **Current Status:** The bill (S 4029) was introduced in the 119th Congress by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Senate. The bill has not advanced further at this time.
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Air Plan Approval; Indiana; Regional Haze Plan for the Second Implementation Period".
# Summary of SJRES 122 **What the Bill Does:** This is a "disapproval resolution," which is a mechanism Congress uses to reject federal agency rules. If passed, it would overturn an EPA regulation that approved Indiana's plan for reducing regional haze pollution—primarily from power plants and industrial sources—during the 2024-2034 period. Regional haze rules aim to improve visibility in national parks and wilderness areas by limiting air pollution that drifts across state lines. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect Indiana's power plants, industrial facilities, and utilities that must comply with air quality standards, as well as environmental quality and visibility in national parks and protected areas. It could also impact neighboring states that benefit from Indiana's pollution controls. Indiana residents and businesses relying on the regulated industries would be indirectly affected. **Current Status:** The resolution was introduced by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full Senate or House. For the resolution to pass, it would need majority support in both chambers and could not be vetoed by the President—a deliberate feature of the Congressional Review Act process.
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category-Deadline Extensions; Correction".
# Summary of SJRES 120 **What the Bill Would Do:** This bill is a "disapproval resolution" that would reject an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule about water pollution limits from coal and natural gas power plants. Specifically, it targets an EPA rule that extended deadlines for power plants to comply with effluent (wastewater) standards. If passed, this resolution would overturn the EPA's deadline extensions, forcing power plants to meet the original compliance timelines rather than the extended ones. **Who It Affects and Key Details:** The bill would directly impact steam electric power plants across the country, requiring them to implement stricter water quality standards on a faster timeline. Power plant operators would need to invest in pollution control equipment sooner than the EPA's extended deadline allowed. The resolution uses a congressional procedure that allows either chamber to disapprove federal regulations within a set timeframe. It was introduced by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) and is currently in committee. **Current Status:** As of now, the bill remains in committee and has not advanced to a full vote in either chamber of Congress.
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Air Plan Approval; Montana; Regional Haze Plan for the Second Implementation Period".
# Summary of SJRES 119 **What the Bill Would Do** This resolution would use a congressional procedure called the Congressional Review Act to block an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule regarding Montana's air quality plan for reducing regional haze—pollution that reduces visibility in areas like national parks and wilderness areas. If passed, it would overturn the EPA's approval of Montana's plan for the second implementation period (covering roughly 2024-2034). Regional haze rules require states to make progress in improving visibility at scenic areas by reducing emissions from power plants and other industrial sources. **Who It Affects and Current Status** The resolution primarily affects Montana, the EPA, and entities in Montana subject to air pollution controls—particularly power plants and industrial facilities. It could also impact scenic areas and public health in the region. The bill is currently in committee and has not advanced further in the legislative process. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) is the sponsor, though notably, the bill targets a rule in a state with different political representation.
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Oil and Natural Gas Sector Climate Review: Extension of Deadlines in Standards of Performance for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources".
# Summary of SJRES 121 **What the Bill Does:** This bill would disapprove of an EPA rule that extended deadlines for implementing climate standards for the oil and natural gas industry. Specifically, the EPA had delayed when oil and gas companies must meet new pollution control requirements for both new facilities and existing ones. This resolution uses Congress's power to reject federal agency rules it disagrees with. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects oil and natural gas companies, which would face stricter timelines for meeting emissions standards if this resolution passes. It could also impact consumers through potential effects on energy prices, as well as environmental advocates and communities near oil and gas operations. **Current Status:** The bill is sponsored by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full Congress. No further action has been taken at this time.
No Escaping Justice Act of 2026
# No Escaping Justice Act of 2026 Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The No Escaping Justice Act of 2026 (HR 7857) is currently in committee and has not yet been voted on. Based on its title, the bill appears intended to address issues related to preventing individuals from evading legal accountability, though specific provisions are not detailed in the available information. Without access to the bill's full text, the precise mechanics of how it would achieve this goal cannot be determined from the title alone. **Current Status** This bill is in the early stages of the legislative process, having been introduced in the 119th Congress by Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL). Being "in committee" means it has not yet advanced to a full House floor vote. The bill would need to pass committee review, gain House approval, then go through the Senate before potentially becoming law. **Note**: For a complete understanding of who would be affected and the bill's specific provisions, you would need to review the full text of HR 7857 on Congress.gov or similar legislative databases, as the summary information available here is limited.
Real Courts, Rule of Law Act of 2026
# Real Courts, Rule of Law Act of 2026 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Real Courts, Rule of Law Act of 2026 (HR 7836) is currently in congressional committee, meaning details about its specific provisions are not yet publicly available in standard legislative databases. The bill's title suggests it aims to address court procedures and the application of legal principles, but the exact provisions and scope cannot be confirmed without access to the bill's full text. **Current Status:** As of now, this bill remains in committee review and has not advanced to a floor vote in either chamber. It was introduced by Representative Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) during the 119th Congress. To learn what this bill specifically proposes, affected parties, and detailed provisions, you would need to review the complete bill text on Congress.gov or other legislative tracking resources. **How to Find More Information:** For accurate details about this bill's specific contents and provisions, I'd recommend visiting Congress.gov and searching "HR 7836" or reviewing updates from Rep. Lofgren's official office.
NOAA Weather Radio Modernization Act
# NOAA Weather Radio Modernization Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The NOAA Weather Radio Modernization Act would update and improve the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) weather radio system. Weather radios are devices that alert the public to severe weather warnings like tornadoes, hurricanes, and flash floods. This bill would modernize the aging network of transmitters and equipment that broadcast these life-saving alerts across the country. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** The bill primarily affects the general public who rely on weather radio alerts for emergency warnings, as well as NOAA and other government agencies responsible for weather forecasting and emergency communications. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, modernization bills of this type typically address infrastructure upgrades, improved signal coverage, technology updates, and funding mechanisms to ensure the system can better serve communities in an increasingly connected world. **Current Status** As of now, HR 7813 is in committee, meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full vote in the House of Representatives. The bill was sponsored by Representative Brian Babin (R-TX).
Fair Housing for Survivors Act of 2026
# Fair Housing for Survivors Act of 2026 (HR 7856) **What the Bill Would Do:** Based on its title and sponsorship, this bill appears designed to protect domestic violence survivors in their housing situations. While specific provisions aren't detailed in the available information, fair housing protections for survivors typically address issues like preventing housing discrimination based on abuse history, allowing lease breaks for safety reasons, and protecting victims' privacy from abusers seeking rental information. **Who It Affects:** The bill would primarily affect domestic violence survivors seeking housing or maintaining existing leases, as well as landlords and property managers who would need to comply with new fair housing requirements. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee (as of the 119th Congress), meaning it has been introduced but has not yet advanced to a full floor vote. No additional details about specific provisions are publicly available at this stage. --- *Note: For complete and current information about this bill's specific provisions, recommended next steps would be to check Congress.gov or contact the bill's sponsor's office.*
To amend title 28, United States Code, to redefine the eastern and middle judicial districts of Louisiana.
# Summary of HR 7835 **What the Bill Does** HR 7835 would redraw the boundaries of two federal court districts in Louisiana—the Eastern District and the Middle District. These districts determine which federal courts handle cases in different parts of the state. The bill essentially proposes reorganizing how Louisiana's federal judicial system is geographically divided. **Who It Affects** This change would impact Louisiana residents and businesses involved in federal court cases, as their cases could be heard in different courts depending on where they live. It would also affect federal judges and court staff who work in these districts. **Current Status** The bill was introduced by Representative Julia Letlow (R-LA) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House. No specific details about the proposed boundary changes are provided in the available information, so the practical implications of the redistricting are unclear at this stage.
Shut Down Sanctuary Policies Act
# Shut Down Sanctuary Policies Act Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Shut Down Sanctuary Policies Act would restrict federal funding to state and local governments that have "sanctuary" policies—rules that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement efforts. If passed, jurisdictions that refuse to assist Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or comply with certain federal immigration requests could lose federal grants and funding. **Who It Affects and Key Provisions** This bill would primarily impact cities and states with sanctuary policies, as well as their residents who rely on federally-funded services. It would also affect immigrants in those areas by potentially increasing immigration enforcement cooperation. The bill uses federal funding as leverage to pressure local governments to participate in immigration enforcement, even though local agencies currently have no legal obligation to do so. **Current Status** As of now, HR 7640 remains in committee and has not advanced to a floor vote. The bill reflects ongoing debate between those who view sanctuary policies as obstructing immigration enforcement and those who argue that local police should focus on community safety rather than federal immigration matters.
Most Favored Patient Act of 2026
# Most Favored Patient Act of 2026 - Summary **What the Bill Would Do** The Most Favored Patient Act of 2026 (HR 7837) is a healthcare-related bill currently under consideration in Congress. However, detailed information about its specific provisions is not available in the provided summary. To understand exactly what this bill would do—such as whether it addresses drug pricing, insurance coverage, patient rights, or another healthcare issue—you would need to review the full bill text on Congress.gov. **Current Status and Next Steps** The bill was introduced by Representative Daniel Meuser (R-PA) in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. Bills in committee can be modified, debated further, or stalled before moving forward. **How to Learn More** To get the complete details about what this bill proposes, who it would affect, and its key provisions, visit Congress.gov and search for "HR 7837" to access the official bill text and any amendments or supporting documents.
Geothermal Cost-Recovery Authority Act of 2025
# Geothermal Cost-Recovery Authority Act of 2025 - Summary **What It Does** This bill would allow the Department of the Interior to charge fees to companies that apply for or hold geothermal leases on federal land. These fees would cover the government's costs for reviewing lease applications, issuing drilling permits, and monitoring ongoing geothermal development and cleanup activities. The authority would last until September 2032. The department could reduce or waive fees if paying them would cause economic hardship or if doing so would encourage greater use of geothermal energy resources. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects geothermal energy companies seeking to develop geothermal resources on public lands. The fees would be used to fund Interior Department operations related to geothermal leasing and oversight, potentially reducing the need for other government funding sources. Ultimately, costs could be passed along to consumers through energy prices, though the bill aims to keep the requirement reasonable. **Current Status** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress (2025) by Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and is currently in committee, meaning it has not yet been voted on by the full House of Representatives. It remains in the early stages of the legislative process.
Geothermal Royalty Reform Act
# Geothermal Royalty Reform Act Summary **What It Would Do** The Geothermal Royalty Reform Act would change how the federal government collects payments (called "royalties") from companies that develop geothermal energy on public lands. Geothermal energy harnesses heat from within the Earth to generate electricity. Currently, the royalty rates and terms are set by existing law, and this bill would reform those terms—likely to make them more favorable to geothermal development, though the specific changes aren't detailed in the basic bill information available. **Who It Affects** The bill primarily affects geothermal energy companies operating on federal lands, the states where these projects operate (particularly Utah and western states), and the federal government's energy revenues. Indirectly, it could impact consumers who use geothermal-generated electricity and taxpayers, since changes to royalties affect public land revenues. **Current Status** The bill was introduced in the 119th Congress and is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. No action has been taken to advance it further at this time.
Enhancing Geothermal Production on Federal Lands Act
# Enhancing Geothermal Production on Federal Lands Act (HR 5576) **What the Bill Does:** This bill would make it easier for companies to develop geothermal energy projects—power generation from heat beneath the Earth's surface—on federal lands managed by the government. The legislation would streamline the permitting process and potentially adjust lease terms or royalty requirements to encourage more geothermal development on public property. **Who It Affects:** The bill primarily affects energy companies interested in geothermal projects, western states where most geothermal resources are located, and potentially consumers through its impact on renewable energy development and electricity supply. Federal land management agencies like the Bureau of Land Management would also be involved in implementing any changes. **Current Status:** As of now, HR 5576 remains in committee and has not been voted on by the full House of Representatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Russ Fulcher, a Republican from Idaho, reflecting the strong geothermal resources in that region.
Star-Spangled Summit Act of 2025
# Star-Spangled Summit Act of 2025 Summary **What the Bill Would Do:** The Star-Spangled Summit Act of 2025 would establish new regulations related to forests, forestry, and tree management, with specific provisions connected to national symbols and licensing requirements. Based on its subjects, the bill appears to address how forests and timber operations are regulated, particularly in Utah, though specific details about the exact provisions aren't publicly available from the subject listing alone. **Who It Affects:** This bill would primarily impact Utah residents and businesses involved in forestry, timber management, and tree harvesting. It could also affect federal land management policies in the state and potentially anyone involved in outdoor recreation or conservation in affected areas. **Current Status:** The bill is currently in committee, meaning it hasn't yet been debated or voted on by the full House of Representatives. As a recently introduced bill in the 119th Congress, it is still in the early stages of the legislative process. *Note: For more detailed information about specific provisions, you may want to visit Congress.gov, where the full text of HR 4684 would provide complete legislative language.*