Bills/S. 26

A bill to exclude locality adjustments from average pay for purposes of computing the amount of retirement annuities of new employees.

A bill to exclude locality adjustments from average pay for purposes of computing the amount of retirement annuities of new employees.

In CommitteeOtherSenateSenate Bill · 119th Congress
Bill Progress · Senate
Introduced
Committee
Passed House
Passed Senate
Passed Both
Signed

Plain Language Summary

# Summary of S. 26: Federal Retirement Annuity Changes **What the bill would do:** This bill would change how federal employee retirement benefits are calculated for newly hired workers. Specifically, it would exclude "locality adjustments"—extra pay that federal employees receive in certain high-cost areas—from the calculation used to determine their retirement pensions. Currently, these locality payments (which compensate for regional cost-of-living differences) are included in the formula that determines how much a retiring federal employee receives as a pension. **Who it affects:** The bill would only apply to new federal employees hired in the future, not current employees or retirees.

It primarily affects workers in the Federal Employees' Retirement System (FERS), particularly those in geographic areas where federal salaries lag behind private sector jobs by more than 5%. These are typically major metropolitan areas and regions with higher costs of living. **Current status:** The bill was introduced by Senator Bill Cassidy (R-LA) but remains in committee and has not been voted on by the full Senate. While supporters might argue this could reduce long-term government spending on pensions, critics could raise concerns about how it affects federal recruitment and retention in competitive job markets.

CRS Official Summary

This bill excludes locality-based comparability payments from the calculation of retirement and disability annuities for new employees in the Federal Employees’ Retirement System. (General schedule and certain other federal employees receive locality-based comparability payments when their official worksite is located in a geographic area with a pay disparity between federal and non-federal workers of more than 5%.)

Advertisement

Latest Action

January 7, 2025

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Subjects

Employee benefits and pensionsGovernment employee pay, benefits, personnel management

Sponsor

R
Cassidy, Bill [R-LA]
R-LA · Senate

Key Dates

Introduced
January 7, 2025
Last Updated
January 7, 2025
Read Full Text on Congress.gov →
Advertisement